Download Nominalism and Realism: Volume 1: Universals and Scientific by D. M. Armstrong PDF
By D. M. Armstrong
This can be a examine, in volumes, of 1 of the longest-standing philosophical difficulties: the matter of universals. In quantity I David Armstrong surveys and criticizes the most methods and options to the issues which have been canvassed, rejecting a few of the types of nominalism and 'Platonic' realism. In quantity II he develops an immense thought of his personal, an target concept of universals established no longer on linguistic conventions, yet at the real and power findings of usual technology. He hence reconciles a realism approximately features and family with an empiricist epistemology. the idea permits, too, for a powerful clarification of usual legislation as kin among those universals.
Read or Download Nominalism and Realism: Volume 1: Universals and Scientific Realism (Universals & Scientific Realism) PDF
Best metaphysics books
Causation and Laws of Nature (Routledge Studies in Contemporary Philosophy)
This can be the 1st English translation of Causalite´ et Lois de l. a. Nature, and is a vital contribution to the idea of causation. Max Kistler reconstructs a unified notion of causation that's normal sufficient to thoroughly take care of either straightforward actual tactics, and the macroscopic point of phenomena we come across in lifestyle.
Efficient Causation: A History
Causation is now as a rule purported to contain a succession that instantiates a few law-like regularity. effective Causation: A historical past examines how our smooth inspiration constructed from a really assorted knowing of effective causation. This quantity starts off with Aristotle's preliminary perception of effective causation, after which considers the differences and reconsiderations of this notion in past due antiquity, medieval and sleek philosophy, finishing with modern bills of causation.
The Cosmos of Duty: Henry Sidgwick's Methods of Ethics
Roger Crisp provides a entire research of Henry Sidgwick's The tools of Ethics, a landmark paintings first released in 1874. Crisp argues that Sidgwick is basically correct approximately many principal matters in ethical philosophy: the metaphysics and epistemology of ethics, consequentialism, hedonism approximately wellbeing and fitness, and the burden to accept to self-interest.
Cosmos and Logos : studies in Greek philosophy
The six experiences comprising this quantity care for a few basic concerns in early Greek suggestion: cosmic overview in Anaximander, the speculation of opposites from the Pre-Socratics to Plato and Aristotle, concept experimentation in Pre-Socratic idea, the origins of Greek Skepticism one of the Sophisists, the prehistory of "Buridan's Ass" hypothesis, and the position of esthesis in Aristotle's concept of technology.
- Wittgenstein and Plato: Connections, Comparisons and Contrasts
- Leibniz’s Metaphysics of Nature: A Group of Essays
- Spinoza: Complete Works
- Metaphysics and the Origin of Species
Extra resources for Nominalism and Realism: Volume 1: Universals and Scientific Realism (Universals & Scientific Realism)
Example text
Given that the study of ontology has been going on for more than two thousand years and has treated a relatively uniform collection of concepts—just compare it to what was regarded as logic at various times—I take it that there is some plausibility in assuming there to be a unifying bond which ties together what this discipline talks about. We only have to find out what this bond is. I do not agree, however, that this is in any way obvious, as for example Nicolai Hartmann assumes in his four-volume study of ontology: And if one inquires further what the [ontological] categories are, the answer is immediately obvious as soon as one considers some examples, such as unity and plurality, quantity and quality, measure and size, time and space, becoming and permanence, causality and necessity and so forth.
But given that the >-maximal categories properly include the ontological categories, how far down the ordering shall we go? Where is the cut-off point for ontological categories? Given the second assumption there must be some such point. Clearly, on Katz’s analysis it is after the highest node or nodes of the tree of kinds. But this seems to be unsatisfactory, especially if there is one universal marker (as for example in CHISHOLM, LOWE, GROSSMANN, HOFFMAN/ROSENKRANTZ, and CYC), which would then have to be considered as the only ontological category and would make ontology a rather boring discipline.
14 18 Fig. 7 Sample cases CYC §2 Common features The seven systems of ontological categories discussed above will have given the reader some impression of the diversity of accounts which have been advanced by ontologists. In spite of this diversity most of them have several features in common. These features can be divided into two groups: the content of the systems and their structure. It is clear that there is no such thing as a set of ontological categories which all systems agree on. But there is a considerable degree of overlap.