Download The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological PDF

Publish 12 months note: First released in 2012 by way of Acumen
------------------------

"NYPPP" offers an annual foreign discussion board for phenomenological study within the spirit of Husserl's groundbreaking paintings and the extension of this paintings by means of such figures as Scheler, Heidegger, Sartre, Levinas, Merleau-Ponty and Gadamer.

Show description

Read or Download The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy: Volume 11 PDF

Best phenomenology books

Das Zeitdenken bei Husserl, Heidegger und Ricoeur

Die vorliegende Studie untersucht das Zeitdenken von Husserl, Heidegger und Ricoeur in philosophiehistorischer, systematischer und methodologischer Hinsicht. Damit liefert sie zugleich eine Übersicht über die Zeitproblematik in der Phänomenologie als deren wichtigste Autoren Husserl, Heidegger und zuletzt auch Ricoeur gelten können.

Phenomenology and Existentialism in the Twentieth Century: Book One New Waves of Philosophical Inspirations

Phenomenology and existentialism reworked realizing and adventure of the 20 th Century to their center. they'd strikingly assorted inspirations and but the 2 waves of concept grew to become merged as either events flourished. the current number of examine dedicated to those routine and their unfolding interplay is now specifically revealing.

The Metaphysics of Liberty

Philosophy suffers from an far more than convoluted introspection. One result's that strategies multiply unchecked. That a few occasions have observable explanations will get reified right into a First reason or, in a extra secular age, to the thesis that each occasion is fatalistically made up our minds. one other concern of convoluted introspection is that tiny yet the most important assumptions slip in, frequently unawares, with the outcome that densely argued counter-tomes are written in answer and no development is made towards any form of consensus.

Mindfulness

This fresh translation of Martin Heidgger's Mindfulness (Besinnung) makes on hand in English for the 1st time Heidegger's moment significant being-historical treatise. the following Heidegger returns to and elaborates intimately a number of the person dimensions of the traditionally self-showing and remodeling allotments of be-ing.

Additional info for The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy: Volume 11

Example text

Despite the fact that “recent deci cades” had seen the emergence of “pseudonaturalistic” racial and völkisch theories that do detach a necessary essence or existence of the Volk from contingent facts about it, these theories do not, in Rosenzweig’s view, meet the Jewish need he has described. Instead they make available a notion of völkisch “essence” (Wesen), of a “persistent character of a Volk” (AT, 691 – 92/17) that becomes available for atheistic projection. What is then projected onto Jewish essence (here we can discern a caricatured version of Hermann Cohi hen’s philosophy of ethical monotheism)36 is the “­autonomy of the moral law” (AT, 693/19).

Of the whole of mathematics. (LRE, 125) In The Concept of Religion this irony takes another turn. There Cohen argi gues against the Schleiermacherian tendency to view religion psychologi gistically as an expression of a “feeling of the infinite,” which Cohen strictly opposes to what is for him the key “religious feeling,” that of sympi pathy with another’s suffering. Schleiermacher’s “feeling of the infinite” is understood by Cohen to be a kind of totalization, in that it envisions man “giving himself up to” God, understood, pantheistically, as the universe.

Looking not only at what Rosenzweig acknowledges as his debt to Cohen, but also at those aspects of Cohen’s thought that he does not diri rectly acknowledge, but that nevertheless become effective in his thinking, will allow us to focus on how Rosenzweig framed and developed his thinkii ing of individuality and chosenness/election. * How does one assess the legacy of a philosophical school or movemi ment? This was a question Franz Rosenzweig liked to raise with respect to Hermann Cohen, a figure whom he greatly admired, and his “school,” Marburg Neo-Kantianism.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.79 of 5 – based on 32 votes